Working in Partnership in Health and Social Care


The era of medical revolution in regards to the development of health care over the years were handled with little or less negligence.  Before 20th century medical awareness has startled people so much, that they believed that social health care services are only made for destitute and less privileged who can’t afford a better life because hospitals are expensive and merely affordable by wealthy people. Robert Winson on the topic of improving and rebranding health care developed a historical storyline of early age medicine and medical inventions. He outlined the reluctant attitude of doctor-to-Patients health concerns toward infectious diseases and how the enthusiasm of most passionate medical personnel has led to the development of a modernized health care system named “Hospitals”

If it were easy to achieve a groundbreaking concept of health-care invention, then improving it may be a matter of rebranding and integrating the observed strategy in order to make the system to work better. On reforming health and social care, Jeremy Hunt professed an inspiring speech of improving the health system through an integrate work plan, that were meant to exist between NHS and local councils. That also will provide that health system may not need a re-invention but a remodeling which an integrated work plan may offer a useful result.

In this paper, we will make use of the avenue left available to explore, investigate and examine different health care organizations, whereas encouraging them to improve the quality of health service delivered on daily basis and how to partner solely with other health-counters in order to achieve a unified result. On examining the topic at hand, we will identify positive and Negative Corporation of different users of health services, including lack of collaboration between NHS and health council authorities. We will also evaluate partnership between experts in different medical fields, social care and inter-agencies working with them. A critical investigation of this organization may implore a strategic method of resolving the present pitfalls experienced on daily basis in health and social care organization.

Philosophies and concepts

The Secretary of State for Health has made an impressive innovation to health care revolution by announcing £50m funding for dementia eco-friendly creation for most social cares in UK but without disregards has never been the first step taken in partnering with clients and communities in enhancing health care in the country. AMR for more than 5years has been developing workshop, events and avenue for people to assist, work and participate in health care activities in UK, that includes the development of charity organization, involving expert medical researchers in defining the best technique to be implemented for the benefit of curing and arresting ill-health in general. Their innovation has led to the development of group researchers who sets policies, raises awareness, identifies opportunities, protects, manage and how to utilize available resources for useful results. UKCRC also have moved from seeking for donation to innovative the idea of partnering with AMR in order to achieve same interest. In that case, it’s preferable for a health organization to come together putting funds together instead of working independently and stressing for unavailable fund. According to Gillies, who declared that a global health partnership can only be obtained when the declaration of ALMA ATA confession to “HEALTH FOR ALL “led by WHO, are approached as a re-orientation that will influence both primary care, Statutory, health councils, communities and volunteers. For WHO partnership has become a catching phrase since they are mainly interested in Empowering and partnering with health cares for improvement and enhancement.

The clinical comprehensive research on health networking has highlighted the importance of unifying more than thousands of organization in England to assist in health and social care innovation. Such implementation has emerged with 25 local networks headed by NHS which is funded by NIHR partners. Health department has further defined partner as:

  • Raising a high quality peer-review in order to encourage clients to fund the health project
  • Giving out research funding as a way to boost health care re-invention and competition among different organization seeking for health improvement
  • While putting in records the result of DHS and NHS in order for health councils to review in the necessity of maintaining a better approach to the formal strategy used for improving health and social care organizations.

In England many clinics has engaged in this research and evolutional concept which is funded by NIHR. Such clinics diagnosis Cancer, Dementia, diabetes, medical illness in children,  mental health clinics, primary care,  and stroke/TIA. The philosophical concept in health and social care partnership in most UK region can be perfected when the intruding idea of “Client’s Choice” is transformed into “Consumer’s Choice”. Which acknowledging to Ros Carnewell is the core reason why medical poverty is still prevalent in UK.  Ros equates medical poverty with general insufficiencies and summarize that “Illness and Poverty has little or nothing in common”.

The client’s in assumptions are NHS and community social care givers. Let’s assume that an aged patient needs both social care service and surgical assistant through major hospitals. The case in study here is the problem of caring for an aged patient with a medical need. The quality of medical services offered to this patient can never be efficient without the corporation of the both institution working as partners in arresting the health and social necessity of this consumer. Therefore, it’s agreeable to say that the center of focus on health and social care partnership is “collaboration before integration.

Perhaps, we do believe that integrating and investing funds can bring some inadequate health care institutions to life but what happens when all the health care are performing but lacks corporation? In as much as we need the integration of fund, training, and revolution. We also need to collaborate and share medical revolution ideas in order to create an appropriate medical concept for modifying the institution.

Legislation and organizational practices and policies

In order to review the current legislation and organizational practices and policies for partnership working in health and social care, I will underline Gallant statement on partnership and collaboration. Gallant pointed out that the internal declaration of human right statement made in 1948 is to enable each citizen to take control of their own health without depending solely on the State. But Frankel labeled the problems only on the service providers by detailing that the necessity for proper medical education is to ensure that appropriate medical services are offered to the patients.

However, recent public improvement practice and policy have involved both the client’s and the public in the partnership of bettering the health system in general, which according to New NHS Modern Dependable health act (DoH 1997). The health acts emphasized the health and social care centers will agree in same work plan in order to improve the health service offered to the consumers. The legalization policies have gone further to encourage joint education and deployment of staffs for the both health care system. NHS Executive has also declared in 1998, the development of community as a way of eradicating poor health and also three-way-partnership between NHS workforce.

Differences in working practices and policies

Before the word collaboration stepped into medical system, the health and social care are known to experience a common barrier which has kept both apart from working together. But the innovation of SLA concept which is known as Service Level agreement has caused both to work better in recent times. Yet, main attribute of working together which is trust, respect, communal working, team work, eradication of boundaries, allies are yet to be totally achieved between health and social care centers. Due to collaboration concept some high-graded medical organization is seeing the practice as a qualification threat to their career-orientation and professionalism. The issue of staging post and placing each organizational personnel above another in medical project may cause disagreement and influence the cause of collaborative working.

Models of partnerships

Before both systems can kick off with potential partnership, they may need to accept a unified re-constitutional rule (UNISON). Hence the model of partnership can be perfected with an order which is beyond a single identity because homogeneity sometimes may result to unnecessary disagreement between the two working parties. However, there are different types of modeled partnership which may work between the two health care systems, such as

  •  Project partnership: this type of partnership is time-limited and will be designed to benefit both the health and social care centers.
  • Problem-orientation partnership: a designed partnership meant to meet problems of both health systems
  • Ideological partnership: The point of view of both parties should be considered in any decision making.
  • Ethical partnership: a designed partnership meant to improve a better way of living for both clients and consumers (Patients)

Evaluate partnerships relationships

The rule of partnership relationship between health and social care services should be since as a sort of “negotiation” which may help both parties to operate effectively. Therefore, in order to evaluate the partnership relationship within the health and social care services, it’s perfect to emphasis that both should focus on the work available and put aside personality, post, medical titles and work positions. Tips which can help both health and social care services to work better

  • They should use more expertise, knowledge and responsibility other than roles and titles.
  • Non-hierarchical model of relationship maybe used to resolve conflicts.
  • Sharing of work practice and expertise
  • Ability to work together without envy or negligence
  • Better networking potentials
  • Joint venture and team working

Recent search terms:

working in partnership health and social care | partnership in health and social care setting | analyse models of partnership working across health and social care | what is working in partnership helath and socila care ] | philosophy of working in partnership | philosophies of working in partnership | partnership reviews on practice in health and social care setting | explain the philosophy of working in health and social care | evaluate partnership relationships within health and social care | benifit of working in partneraship helath and socila care |